Now, given how little we know, I won't rule that out. I don't suppose that visions of the future, waking or dreaming, necessarily have any sort of technological link. What a person DOES is sometimes so much more revealing than anything he might say. What else is out there that is known about but not yet developed in the light of day? Probably a whole lot! I just know that I am really enjoying getting to know this person and watching how he deals with this situation. If someone had put a drawing of an Ionic Breeze in front of Edward Teller in 1962 would he have believed the source that handed him the drawing?
Brown may have been "ahead of his time" in the twenties and forties and sixties but that is not stopping people NOW from finally seeing what he was trying to show them. So why be in a rush to tell everything when its a waiting game anyway!ĭr. How and why should people believe them? Well, maybe the only way is for time to prove them out. Seems like this is the problem that seers and wisemen have had through the centuries. Maybe we are just given as much as we can chew at any one time? Now you are saying, "yes but ( sort of) IF I had been told EVERYTHING about Townsend Brown all at once, would I have believed those sources? And then, you added, would others have believed me? Perhaps that was a problem that was wisely avoided? Perhaps thats the way with everything and everybody. You even admitted that there were moments when you whined ! and we have seen little reflections of that here and there! I have seen you complain about not getting all of the material that you wanted.